Are Investment-Grade Bonds Still Worth Holding?
With investment-grade bond yields at historic lows, it’s not surprising to hear investors express concerns about the effectiveness of fixed-income allocations in a strategic portfolio. Some investors have even questioned whether it’s time to abandon investment-grade bond allocations altogether. While an understandable consideration given the historically low rates and narrow spreads, our answer is a resounding ‘No.’
We believe that investment-grade bonds will continue to offer a combination of better returns than cash (positive risk premium) and genuine diversification benefits relative to equities. In our view, those diversification benefits are particularly notable since equity risk typically dominates investors’ portfolios. If the economic recovery out of the current pandemic were to falter, we think exposure to bonds could help mitigate harm caused by a drop in stock prices. On the other hand, if economic growth strengthens, we would expect investment-grade bonds to hold their value given the outlook for continued low interest rates as a result of efforts by global central banks to support the economic recovery.
Let’s take a closer look at investment-grade bonds both as a standalone investment and as a component of a diversified portfolio.
Asset-class risk: standalone investments
When considering investment-grade bonds as a standalone investment, an increasingly common fear among investors is that low interest rates (which result in low yields) will undermine their investment from both risk and return perspectives. Put another way, investors are questioning whether the now-paltry expected returns are worth the usual risk that a bond issuer may default and fail to repay the loan. We would make the case that the expected return relative to stocks appears unchanged and, therefore, the relative attractiveness of each asset class remains the same.
There is no clear indication that return assumptions today are any different than they have always been—with investment-grade bonds (as measured by the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index) historically expected to return about 1% to 2% more than cash (the return on cash is often referred to as the short-term risk-free rate) on an annualized basis, and stocks (as measured by the S&P/TSX Composite Index) expected to return roughly 5%-6% more than cash. In addition to risk premiums (excess return expectations above the cash rate) remaining the same, expected total returns (the return that includes interest payments and changes in principal) have lowered across all asset types at roughly the same pace. This would imply that the relative attractiveness of each asset class remains the same; that is, the rewards for taking risk, over and above the risk-free rate, have not significantly changed.
With seemingly nowhere to go but up, do low interest rates mean bond returns will be more volatile than they have been historically as rates begin to rise? We can assess this by examining interest-rate risk, a measure of potential portfolio losses when interest rates rise that is a function of both duration and the volatility of yields themselves. History suggests that while lower rates imply higher duration, yield volatility actually tends to decline as the level of yields declines. Exhibit 1 illustrates this point using 10-year Government of Canada bonds as an example; similar experiences can be seen in bond markets throughout the developed world.
While a sharp move higher in yields would reduce bond prices in the near term (prices and yields have an inverse relationship), it would also improve the reinvestment outlook (as bonds mature, investors can purchase new bonds that offer a higher rate of interest) and increase expected longer-term returns. Exhibit 2 utilizes U.S. data (based on the better availability of historical data), but we believe the chart illustrates concepts that transcend geography. Perhaps somewhat counterintuitively, a rising-rate environment could be the most beneficial of the potential outcomes over a longer-term horizon.
Portfolio risk
When rates fall further and further, fixed-income returns are often challenged. As the price of a bond climbs higher, the fixed coupon payment (paid to investors in the form of interest) becomes smaller by comparison. This leaves investors subject to “reinvestment risk”—that is, when proceeds from maturing bonds are reinvested in a less favourable environment of higher prices and lower yields. Investors in this scenario commonly wonder whether bonds are too richly valued to fill their traditional role of portfolio diversifier.
However, in a world of low or negative short-term interest rates, we believe it is reasonable to view valuations as elevated across all financial assets (including stocks and bonds). As a result, forward-looking expected returns would likely be lower across the board—not just for fixed-income investments. So the question then becomes, “Are correlations between bonds and riskier assets such as equities still low enough to provide diversification benefits?”
Historical data show that the correlation between bonds and equities tends to remain low in periods of stress—and, in many cases, actually falls. As in the previous chart, we utilize U.S. data (based on the better availability of historical data) for Exhibit 3. We believe this demonstrates that investment-grade bonds are one of the few asset classes that are genuinely diversifying to equities.
Diversification: first, last, always
We realize low yields don’t excite anyone. We are also well aware that diversified portfolios are unlikely to make the list of the year’s top performers. Still, we firmly believe that seeking to maximise returns and minimise risks is the right way to approach portfolio construction. Accordingly, we’ll be holding on the bonds in our strategic allocations.
Glossary of Financial Terms
Duration: The change in a bond’s price given a change in interest rates.
Index Definitions
Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index: a benchmark index composed of U.S. securities in Treasury, government-related, corporate and securitized sectors. It includes securities that are of investment-grade quality or better and have at least one year to maturity.
FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index: a benchmark index used to measure the performance of fixed-rate, investment-grade domestic government and corporate bonds denominated in Canadian dollars.
Ibbotson U.S. Large Company Stock Index: a benchmark index that measures large company stocks. It is represented by the S&P 500 Composite Index (S&P 500) from 1957 to present, and the S&P 90 from 1926 to 1956.
Ibbotson U.S. Intermediate-Term Government Bond Index: a benchmark index that is measured using a one-bond portfolio with a maturity near five years
S&P/TSX Composite Index: a capitalization-weighted index that is the principal reference for Canadian equities markets. The index includes Canadian-based common stocks and income trust units.
Important Information
SEI Investments Canada Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of SEI Investments Company, is the investment fund manager and portfolio manager of the SEI Funds in Canada.
The information contained herein is for general and educational information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal, tax, accounting, securities, research or investment advice regarding the Funds or any security in particular, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment. This information should not be construed as a recommendation to purchase or sell a security, derivative or futures contract. You should not act or rely on the information contained herein without obtaining specific legal, tax, accounting and investment advice from an investment professional. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time and is not intended to be a forecast of future events, or a guarantee of future results. There is no assurance as of the date of this material that the securities mentioned remain in or out of the SEI Funds.
This material may contain “forward-looking information” (“FLI”) as such term is defined under applicable Canadian securities laws. FLI is disclosure regarding possible events, conditions or results of operations that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action. FLI is subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations as expressed or implied in this material. FLI reflects current expectations with respect to current events and is not a guarantee of future performance. Any FLI that may be included or incorporated by reference in this material is presented solely for the purpose of conveying current anticipated expectations and may not be appropriate for any other purposes.
Information contained herein that is based on external sources or other sources is believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed by SEI Investments Canada Company, and the information may be incomplete or may change without notice.
There are risks involved with investing, including loss of principal. Diversification may not protect against market risk. There may be other holdings which are not discussed that may have additional specific risks. In addition to the normal risks associated with investing, international investments may involve risk of capital loss from unfavourable fluctuation in currency values, from differences in generally accepted accounting principles or from economic or political instability in other nations. Emerging markets involve heightened risks related to the same factors, in addition to those associated with their relatively small size and lesser liquidity. Bonds and bond funds will decrease in value as interest rates rise.
Index returns are for illustrative purposes only, and do not represent actual performance of an SEI Fund. Index returns do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses. Indexes are unmanaged and one cannot invest directly in an index.
Commissions, trailing commissions, management fees and expenses all may be associated with mutual fund investments. Please read the prospectus before investing. Mutual funds are not guaranteed, their values change frequently and past performance may not be repeated.